hardly a new concept has been more battered, more irresponsibly tried to make the concept of ownership. Distorted, misrepresented, concealed, covered, stained, matted, with him everything has happened. Understandably, the concept of property is at the core of the operating system, and also the support of liberation.
When it comes to property, and this is very important, we refer to the Media Ownership of production, not ownership of assets. Speaking of ownership, without specifying which, is a hoax.
is not the same property of a motorcycle, a bicycle or a shirt, which are assets that ownership of Polaris, it is a means of production, in capitalism, is a means of exploitation of the workers.
A social system is as relationship property repeat, Media Production. The whole social structure is based on that relationship. But ... Why is it essential that relationship property? How does the characterization of the social system?
The ratio of property needs and determines consciousness, spirituality, a culture that justifies it, perpetuate and reproduce. Value and culture influence each other. Awareness and relationship property form a set that supports the social system. Each system belongs to a set of social relations of property and specific awareness.
The slave system, for example, stood on the enslavement of workers and a culture, spirituality, justifying this slavery.
It follows that for a Revolution Case of Media Ownership of production is not trivial, is not a choice that is made lightly, is on the contrary, a central point progress of the revolutionary process. Entangled
this topic postulating that evil is a monopoly and other forms capitalist property are not, if we say that socialism is enough social ownership of basic industries and the rest can be capitalist property, and if we clarify the difference between means of production and assets, allow the mix the bourgeoisie. Talking property and not specify what is a trap.
If popular forms of economy are not integrated to form a national social fabric, if they remain isolated, then we are creating the economic basis for confusion in spirituality, weakening the revolutionary cause.
Thus we form a complex opposite Socialism, strengthen the dominant set, the selfish relationship in the economy and culture. We can not and hit hard the capitalist system, it would be impossible to establish the social complex.
conclude that capitalist ownership of the means of production is counter , always. And the success of the revolution is closely linked to the sharpness in front of his fighter.
It is therefore important to construct forms of social ownership of the means of production and also need to spread their advertising and statements of the leaders.
With Chavez Resteaos!
0 comments:
Post a Comment